top of page

History on Stage

Life skill related: 

Managing Learning

History on Stage

Methodology: 

Managing Learning

Peer review 

Teamwork 

Collaboration

Subject:

History

Age/Grade: 

11-14 years old

Timing: 

240 minutes 

Materials/suggestions

Required Materials:

  • Historical texts or online resources about history

  • Paper and pens

  • Large sheets of paper or whiteboard paper

  • Peer evaluation sheets


Activity in small groups.

Activities are developed in 2/4 meeting

Description of the activity:

Lesson 1: Historical Research


Opening Activity (15 min):

  • Introduce the concept of "Managing Learning" and peer evaluation. Explain the importance of taking control of one's learning and providing constructive feedback on others' work.

  • Use an interactive approach. For example, start a guided class discussion on the meaning of "Managing Learning," encouraging students to share their ideas on how they can take control of their learning. Then, present the concept of peer evaluation, explaining that it involves providing constructive suggestions and critiques to help others improve. Show examples of useful and non-useful feedback and discuss the differences.


Individual or Small Group Research (40 min):

  • Students select a historical topic of interest and conduct individual research using historical texts or online resources. They can focus on an event, period, or historical figure.

  • During individual research, students might choose topics like the French Revolution, the fall of the Roman Empire, or the life of a historical figure like Martin Luther King Jr. Provide a list of reliable online resources or suggest specific historical texts to consult. Students can then use this time to examine available sources, take notes, and gather relevant information on their chosen topic.

  • This activity can also be done in small groups, focusing on collaboration, idea sharing, and developing teamwork skills while exploring a historical topic of interest.

  • Form groups of 3-4 students and allow them to choose a historical topic of interest. Provide a list of options or let the groups choose independently. Each member can take on a specific role to maximize efficiency, such as a lead researcher, note-taker, or coordinator.

  • Groups collaborate using provided online resources or other available sources, dividing the work, examining different sources, and comparing gathered information to get a comprehensive view of the topic.

  • After research, group members reconvene to discuss and synthesize collected information, compare notes, highlight key points, and identify areas needing further investigation.

  • Finally, the group prepares a collective presentation based on their research, with each member contributing their unique findings and perspectives.


Presentation Preparation (25 min):

  • Students prepare a brief presentation based on their research, highlighting key points and relevant information. They can use paper or slides to support their presentation.

  • Students can use online tools and applications to organize and present the information gathered. For example, if researching the French Revolution, a student might create a presentation including historical context, causes, main events, and consequences of the revolution. Encourage creativity by using images or diagrams to make the presentation more engaging.


Lesson 2: Presentation and Evaluation


Student Presentations (40 min):

  • Each student or group presents their research to the class using the information gathered during the research and presentation preparation phases.

  • For instance, a student studying the French Revolution might present an overview of key events, involved leaders, and the revolution's causes and consequences, using slides with images and historical data to illustrate concepts.


Discussion and Feedback (40 min):

  • After each presentation, students provide feedback using peer evaluation sheets. They can evaluate the clarity of the presentation, the completeness of the information, and the presenter’s ability to engage the audience.

  • Peer evaluation criteria include clarity (whether the topics were presented understandably and logically), completeness (whether the main aspects of the topic were covered), and engagement (whether the presenter maintained audience attention).


Final Reflection (15 min):

  • After presentations and feedback, the teacher guides a brief reflective discussion. Students are encouraged to share their opinions on the feedback received and the overall experience of managing their learning and evaluating their peers’ work. They can discuss what they learned, challenges faced, and how they plan to use the feedback for future presentations or historical research.


Notes:

This activity integrates history teaching with developing the life skill of "Managing Learning," encouraging students to take an active role in their learning process and critically evaluate their peers' work. Peer evaluation sheets foster collaboration and shared responsibility in the classroom.

Attachment: Peer Evaluation Sheet for Student Presentations


Peer Evaluation Sheet for Student Presentations

  • Presenting Student/Group Name: _________________________

  • Evaluator's Name: ___________________________


Clarity of Presentation:

  1. Little clarity; topics were confusing and illogical.

  2. Sufficient clarity, but some points were not clearly explained.

  3. Good clarity; topics were understandable and logical.

  4. Excellent clarity; topics were presented exceptionally well.

● Score: _______


Completeness of Information:

  1. Incomplete information; many main aspects were not covered.

  2. Some missing information; some main aspects were not covered.

  3. Fairly complete information; most main aspects were covered.

  4. Complete information; all main aspects were thoroughly covered.

● Score: _______


Ability to Engage the Audience:

  1. No engagement; presentation was boring and monotonous.

  2. Little engagement; some attempts but not very effective.

  3. Moderate engagement; some interesting moments but others less engaging.

  4. High engagement; presentation was dynamic and engaging throughout.

● Score: _______

Additional Feedback (optional): [Space for written feedback]

Subscribe

Suscribe and be the first one in knowing all the news about BRIDGE Project!

Thank you for suscribe!

© 2022 Bridge Partnerhsip (2022-1-IT02-KA220-SCH-000089154)

“Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.”

bottom of page